![]() ![]() Perhaps surprisingly, its third-largest carbon contribution comes from the land-use change and forestry category, which produces more carbon emissions than buildings or manufacturing and construction do. Compared to other similar-sized countries, Canada uses far less coal and more oil and natural gas to power electricity and heat production, as well as transportation in the geographically large country. A forest area the size of Japan has already been lost from Indonesia.Ĭanada's per-capita emissions have dropped over the last five years, but its overall emissions haven't budged as much. First introduced in 2011, the moratorium was made permanent in 2019. That's why the most significant part of the Indonesian government's commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 29% by 2030 is its forest moratorium, which disallows new forest clearance for palm plantations or logging. While Indonesia's contribution to the planet's CO2 debt is significant and growing, most of it comes from a different source: land-use change and deforestation (there has been growing electricity production, transportation, and waste sectors, too, but their contribution is dwarfed by the land-use change). At the same time, these islands are unusually affected by the rising sea levels due to climate change. Indonesia's unique composition means it faces different challenges for both economic growth and reduction of CO2 emissions. Per-capita emissions are highest for oil-producing countries and some island nations, reflecting the huge energy costs the oil business has on the global environment-even before those fossil fuels are burned.Ĭoal and oil use and emissions are both growing in Indonesia, a country comprised of over 17,000 islands in the Pacific Ocean, including the islands of Sumatra, Java, Sulawesi, and parts of Borneo and New Guinea. This method allows us to understand those countries with smaller populations alongside those with larger ones more clearly. Others think that the per-capita emissions numbers-the amount of emissions produced per person-is a more appropriate standard. much of the CO2 emissions come from people, while in China it comes from the manufacturing of products that go to the rest of the world. consumption in the United States is much smaller than China's, meaning that in the U.S. For example, the difference between CO2 used in production vs. Some experts believe that countries like China, whose emissions are high in part because it produces goods that are used by people all over the world, should be measured differently. This article includes emissions numbers per country, but not everyone agrees that this is the best way to identify the worst offenders. Our World Data / Creative Commons BY 4.0 Is This the Right Way to Understand Carbon Emissions? CO2 emissions per country, 2000-2019, top 15 countries. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |